The evolution of compounding research in semantics: A decade of scientometric evidence (2014—2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.v8i1.23791Keywords:
compounding, semantic research, research theme, research trendAbstract
Although compounding has been widely examined within linguistic research, a systematic overview of its semantic research landscape remains underdeveloped. This study addresses this gap by offering a scientometric mapping of trends and thematic orientations in semantic research on compounding. Drawing on a corpus of 376 publications indexed in the Scopus database between 2014 and 2024, the analysis adopts a quantitative approach and employs VOSviewer to examine publication patterns, thematic structures, and research trajectories. The findings point to a steadily expanding field, with an average annual increase of approximately three publications and an overall growth of 187.5% across the eleven-year period. Reading and Writing, Cognition, and Mental Lexicon emerge as the most prominent publication venues. Thematic analysis identified three principal clusters: (a) “Compounding Formation and Description†(40.71%), encompassing terms such as “affixation,†“morphology,†“neologism,†and “word formation process,†(b) “Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Compounding†(20.09%), characterized by keywords including “morphological awareness,†“comprehension,†“development,†and “student.â€, and (c) “Semantic Interpretation and Theoretical Frameworks†(29.20%), which includes terms such as “word meaning,†“semantic composition,†“syntax,†and “theory.†Taken together, these findings offer insights into the current state and trajectory of compounding research in the light of semantics, highlighting key themes within the current patterns of advancement.
Downloads
References
Adamson, L. J. (2024). Root suppletion in Swedish as contextual allomorphy. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-023-09148-0
Aikhenvald, A. Y., Dixon, R. M. W., & White, N. M. (2020). The essence of ‘word.’ In Phonological Word and Grammatical Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0001
Akan, Md. F., Chowdhury, G., Islam, A. K. M. M., Mishu, A., Ahamed, Md. M., Mohamed, K. A. A., & Sultana, I. (2024). A Synopsis of the Lexical Variations in British and American English. World Journal of English Language, 14(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n4p306
Al-Haj Eid, O. A., Abu Guba, M. N., Abu Jweid, A. N., & Abuelhommus, S. M. (2024). Neologisms in Mass Media on Selected CNN TV Programs during Coronavirus Epidemic: A Morphological Analysis. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 24(2), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v24i2.537
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2015). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198747062.001.0001
Bîlbîie, G., Faghiri, P., & Thuilier, J. (2021). Quantitative and experimental syntax: Topics and methods | Syntaxe quantitative et expérimentale: Objets et méthodes. Langages, 223(3), 7–24.
Booij, G. (2020). Principles of word formation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108378291.012
Choi, W., Tong, X., Law, K. K.-S., & Cain, K. (2018). Within- and cross-language contributions of morphological awareness to word reading development in Chinese–English bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 31(8), 1787–1820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9770-0
Dubé, D., & Elin Thordardottir. (2024). Using semantic verbal fluency to estimate the relative and absolute vocabulary size of bilinguals: An exploratory study of children and adolescents. Journal of Communication Disorders, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106450
Fedorenko, E., Blank, I. A., Siegelman, M., & Mineroff, Z. (2020). Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network. Cognition, 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104348
Fritz, I., & Baggio, G. (2020). Meaning composition in minimal phrasal contexts: distinct ERP effects of intensionality and denotation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(10), 1295–1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1749678
Günther, F., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2014). LSAfun - An R package for computations based on Latent Semantic Analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 930–944. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0529-0
Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2019). Enter Sandman: Compound Processing and Semantic Transparency in a Compositional Perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 45(10), 1872–1882. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000677
Günther, F., Petilli, M. A., & Marelli, M. (2020). Semantic transparency is not invisibility: A computational model of perceptually-grounded conceptual combination in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104104
Heine, B., Narrog, H., & Long, H. (2016). Constructional change vs. grammaticalization: From compounding to derivation. Studies in Language, 40(1), 137–175. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.05hei
Henneken, E. A., & Kurtz, M. J. (2019). Usage Bibliometrics as a Tool to Measure Research Activity (pp. 819–834). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_32
Hochmann, J.-R., Tuerk, A. S., Sanborn, S., Zhu, R., Long, R., Dempster, M., & Carey, S. (2017). Children’s representation of abstract relations in relational/array match-to-sample tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 99, 17–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.001
Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342
Hüning, M., & Booij, G. (2014). From compounding to derivation the emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization.†Folia Linguistica, 48(2), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.019
Jackendoff, R. (2009). Meaning and the lexicon: The parallel architecture 1975-2010. Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, R., & Audring, J. (2019). The Texture of the Lexicon. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827900.001.0001
Kim, S., & Pylkkänen, L. (2019). Composition of event concepts: Evidence for distinct roles for the left and right anterior temporal lobes. Brain and Language, 188, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.11.003
Kjellander, D. (2018). Cognitive constraints in English lexical blending: A data collection methodology and an explanatory model. Pragmatics and Cognition, 25(1), 142–173. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18003.kje
Kolbusz-Buda, J. (2024). Between compounding and phrasal derivation: Polish complex nouns in sam(o)-. Word Structure, 17(3), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2024.0240
Lane, E. (2024). Metaphor and ambiguity. Philosophical Studies, 181(11), 3059–3087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02252-1
Libben, G. (2014). The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1–2), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2013.874994
Liceras, J. M., & Klassen, R. (2019). Compounding and derivation:On the “promiscuity†of derivational affixes. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16026
Lieber, R. (2001). Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486296
Lieber, R. (2010). On the lexical semantics of compounds (pp. 127–144). https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.11lie
Lieber, R. (2011). A Lexical Semantic Approach to Compounding. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0005
Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2022). The semantics of conversion nouns and -ing nominalizations: A quantitative and theoretical perspective. Journal of Linguistics, 58(2), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226721000311
Lieber, R., & Å tekauer, P. (2011). Introduction: Status and Definition of Compounding. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0001
Marelli, M., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2017). Compounding as Abstract Operation in Semantic Space: Investigating relational effects through a large-scale, data-driven computational model. Cognition, 166, 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.026
Mattiello, E. (2024). A morphosyntactic and morphosemantic analysis of English slang suffixoids. Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 62(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.4454/ssl.v62i1.380
Mithun, M. (2022). Sitting and talking together: Packaging meaning into verbs with the neighbors. Linguistic Typology, 26(2), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2021-2089
Mohaideen Fathima, P., & Sherif, Y. A. M. (2023). Lexical Variations in Tamil Dialects and Their English Translations: A Critical Study. IUP Journal of English Studies, 18(3).
Momenian, M., Radman, N., Rafipoor, H., Barzegar, M., & Weekes, B. (2021). Compound words are decomposed regardless of semantic transparency and grammatical class: An fMRI study in Persian. Lingua, 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103120
Mustafayeva, S. B. G. (2020). The role of the experiment in the study of the language material. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(10), 1337–1342. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1010.23
Ntelitheos, D. (2022). Compounding in Greek as Phrasal Syntax. Languages, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020151
Nugraha, D. S. (2022). Identifying Indonesian Light Verb Constructions: a Computational Linguistics Approach . In Krisztina K. & G. T. Etelka (Eds.), XVI. Alkalmazott nyelvészett doktoranduszkonferencia. Az MTA Alkalmazott Nyelészeti Munkabizottága és a Nyelvtudományi Kutatóközpont szervezésében.
Nugraha, D. S. (2023). Morphosemantic Features of Mengambil ‘Take’ in the Light Verb Constructions of Indonesian. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 4(3), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v4i3.327
Nugraha, D. S. (2024a). A Corpus-Based Study of Memberi ‘Give’ Light Verb Constructions. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 12(2), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2024.2023112.3389
Nugraha, D. S. (2024b). A Morphological Analysis of the Indonesian Suffixation: A Look at the Different Types of Affixes and Their Semantic Changes. GEMA: Journal of Language Studies, 24(4), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2024-2404-07
Nugraha, D. S. (2024c). Quantitative Analysis within Language Studies: An Analytical Views Based on the Bibliometrics Method. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 9(2), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v9i2.1695
Nugraha, D. S. (2024d). Some Notes on Indonesian Word Formation: A Study Based on the Derivational Morphology Approach. South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(01), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjhss.2024.v06i01.004
Nugraha, D. S. (2025a). A decade of research on word formation in foreign language education: A scientometric mapping (2014–2024). Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 15(2), 485–516. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v15i2.9841
Nugraha, D. S. (2025b). A Quantitative Analysis of Research Trends and Thematic Development in Derivational Morphology. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(4), 1787–1801. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i4.14679
Nugraha, D. S. (2025c). Exploring Integrative Complexity in the Morphology of Indonesian Language. South Asian Research Journal of Arts, Language and Literature, 7(01), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjall.2025.v07i01.002
Nugraha, D. S. (2025d). Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia. ITB Press.
Nugraha, D. S. (2026). Corpus Linguistics and Morphology. In International Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 85–91). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95504-1.01540-4
Olsen, S. (2015). Composition. Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, 1, 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-022
Pasaribu, T. A., & Nugraha, D. S. (2020). The Use of Lexeme HEAD in English and Indonesian Compound Words: A Contrastive Analysis. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing Dan Sastra, 4(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v4i2.13073
Plag, I. (2003). Word-formation in English. Word-Formation in English, 1–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841323
Plag, I. (2019). Word-Formation in English, Second Edition. In Word-Formation in Englis,: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771402
Plag, I. (2020). Productivity and the Mental Lexicon. In Language in Use: A Reader.
Pylkkänen, L., Bemis, D. K., & Elorrieta, E. B. (2014a). Building phrases in language production: An MEG study of simple composition. Cognition, 133(2), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.001
Pylkkänen, L., Bemis, D. K., & Elorrieta, E. B. (2014b). Building phrases in language production: An MEG study of simple composition. Cognition, 133(2), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.001
Ruan, Y., Georgiou, G. K., Song, S., Li, Y., & Shu, H. (2018). Does writing system influence the associations between phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and reading? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000216
Schmidtke, D., Kuperman, V., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2016). Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(2), 556–570. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0926-0
Semenza, C. (2021). Word formation in the brain: Data from aphasia and related disorders. In Current Issues in Linguistic Theory (Vol. 353). https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.08sem
Sooryamoorthy, R. (2020). Scientometrics for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003110415
Spalding, T. L., & Gagné, C. L. (2014). Relational diversity affects ease of processing even for opaque English compounds. Mental Lexicon, 9(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.1.03spa
Sugimoto, Y., Yoshida, R., Jeong, H., Koizumi, M., Brennan, J. R., & Oseki, Y. (2024). Localizing Syntactic Composition with Left-Corner Recurrent Neural Network Grammars. Neurobiology of Language, 5(1 Special), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00118
Taylor, J. R. (2011). Review of Jackendoff (2010): Meaning and the lexicon: The parallel architecture 1975-2010. Studies in Language, 35(4), 951–959. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.4.09tay
Taylor, J. R. (2015). Word-formation in cognitive grammar. Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, 1, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-012/HTML
ten Hacken, P. (2019). Morphology in Jackendoff’s Parallel Architecture. In SpringerBriefs in Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18009-6_3
Toluspayeva, D., Shubina, O., Apshe, K., Shukan, A., Nurguzhina, G., & Mirambaevna, A. B. (2024). Affixation in Morphological Word Formation and Construction of Lexemes in the English and Kazakh Languages. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 12(1), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2024.2019058.3318
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer (1.6.20). Universiteit Leiden.
Vogel, I. (2018). The Morpho-Syntax-Phonology Interface in Complex Compounds. In Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 94). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_24
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2019). Field Normalization of Scientometric Indicators (pp. 281–300). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_11
Xia, Y., Xie, R., Wu, X., Nguyen, T. P., & Wang, Z. (2024). Cross-lagged relationships between vocabulary knowledge and morphological awareness among Chinese children: a longitudinal study from grade 1 to grade 3. Reading and Writing, 37(3), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10364-5
Xie, Q., & Yeung, S. S.-S. (2024). Specifying the contributions of morphological awareness to decoding, syntactic awareness, and reading comprehension in Chinese children learning English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 37(7), 1663–1680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10412-8
Yang, B. (2024). Seven Types of Meaning and Seven Attributes: A Study of Chinese Anti-Pandemic Neologisms Under the Dual Perspective of Lexical Semantics and Lexical Pragmatics. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 30(1), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3001-12
Zhan, H., Huang, S., & Sun, L. (2023). Paradigms as second-order schemas in English noun-participle compounding. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21(2), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00147.zha
Zhang, L., & Pylkkänen, L. (2018). Composing lexical versus functional adjectives: Evidence for uniformity in the left temporal lobe. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(6), 2309–2322. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1469-y
Zingler, T. (2024). Expletive insertion: a morphological approach. English Language and Linguistics, 28(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674323000254
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia uses an Open Access Policy under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Ghancaran Journal holds the copyright and grants the journal rights for first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
The work is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any media or format and adapt, remix, change, and develop the material even for commercial purposes, as long as it is stated credit and license derivative works under similar terms. - Authors may make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published work version.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during submission, as doing so may lead to productive exchange.
