Mafhūmu Fiqhi al-Marātib wa Fiqhi al-Awlawiyyāt fī Maqāṣidi al-Qurʾān: Dirāsah Taṭbīqiyyah fī Malaysia

Authors

  • Siddig Ahmad Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Ahmad Sunawari Long Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Zaizul Ab. Rahman Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Muhammad Taufiq Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura
  • Hüseyin Elmhemit Ordu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v19i1.8917

Keywords:

Maqāṣid al-Qur'ān; Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah; Fiqh al-marātib; Fiqh Al-Awlawiyyāt, Malaysia

Abstract

The debate on the concept of maqÄá¹£id continues to develop dynamically as its relevance to various situations and times. However, misunderstanding the basic principles of maqÄá¹£id which are fixed (al-thawÄbit) and flexible (al-mutaghayyirÄt) causes neglect of one aspect of the basic principles of maqÄá¹£id, and unconsciously leading into dichotomy between the two. Ironically, religious understanding derived from it loses its spirit while maqÄá¹£id is only for the sake of worldly interests while ignoring afterlife mission. This study aims to explain the universal (kullÄ«) and particular (juz’ī) principles of maqÄá¹£id and identify the right approach to implement both principles at the International Islamic University Malaysia. This research used a qualitative approach whose data is obtained through various sources such as observation at the locus, books, journals, conference papers, and relevant websites. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively. This study found that the debate on maqÄá¹£id must be contextualized by understanding the purposes of the Qur'an (maqÄá¹£id al-Qur'Än) which includes the debate on the two principles of maqÄá¹£id. In the discourse of maqÄá¹£id al-Qur'Än, the discussion of maqÄá¹£id al-SharÄ«Ê¿ah is a part that is particular and flexible (al-mutaghayyirÄt). This research also found that the right approach to implement maqÄá¹£id al-Qur'Än is with the fiqh of command (fiqh al-marÄtib). Conversely, the right approach to implementing maqÄá¹£id al-SharÄ«Ê¿ah is with priority fiqh (fiqh Al-AwlawiyyÄt). The integration of the two is practiced and implemented in the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, International Islamic University Malaysia with a context that is very relevant to the context of fiqh that develops in Malaysia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahman, Zulkarnain. “Teori MaqÄá¹£id Al-Syatibi dan Kaitannya dengan Kebutuhan Dasar Manusia Menurut Abraham Maslow.†Al-Fikr 22, no. 1 (2020): 52–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/jumdpi.v22i1.15534.

Ahmad, Siddig, and Wan Suhaimi Wan Abdullah. “Hakikat MaqÄá¹£id Ä€l-Qur’an Imam Al-Ghazali dan Perkembangan Perbahasan Berkenaan MaqÄá¹£id Masa Kini.†Islamiyyat 44, no. IK (2022): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2022-44ik-4.

Al-‘Ati, Sha‘ban ‘Abd. Al-Mu’jam Al-WÄsit. Kairo: Majma‘ al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyah, 2004.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Islam and Secularism, Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age. Kuala Lumpur: Internasional Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 1993.

Al-GhazÄlÄ«, Imam. Al-MustashfÄ Min `Ilm Al-UsÅ«l. Madinah: Dal al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 1993.

Al-Harabi, Bandar Bin Badr Shalabi. AsÄs Al-Dawlah Al-Madaniyyah FÄ« á¹¢aḥīfat Al-MadÄ«nah: DirÄsah TaÊ¿shÄ«liyyah MuqÄranah, n.d.

Al-NajjÄr, Abd al-MajÄ«d. MaqÄá¹£id Al-SharÄ«Ê¿ah Bi AbÊ¿Äd JadÄ«dah. Bairut: Dar el-Gharb al-Islami, 2008.

Al-Qardhawi, Yusuf. FÄ« Fiqh Al-AwlawiyyÄt: DirÄsah JadÄ«dah FÄ« Ḍawʾ Al-QurʾÄn Wa Al-Sunnah. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1996.

Al-Qusyairi, Abu Al-Qasim. Al-RisÄlah Al-QÅ«shayrÄ«yyah FÄ« Ê¿Ilm Al-Tashawwuf. Kairo: Dar Jawami’ al-Kalam, 1428.

Al-Raisuni, Ahmed. Madkhal IlÄ MaqÄá¹£id Al-SharÄ«Ê¿ah. Kairo: Dar al-Kalima, 2010.

Al-Salam, Muhammad Izzuddin Ibn Abd. QawÄ’id Al-AḥkÄm FÄ« Maá¹£Äliḥ Al-AnÄm. Kairo: Maktabah al-Kulliyat al-Azhariyah, 1991.

Al–Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of IslÄm. Kuala Lumpur: UTM PRESS, 1995.

Alatas, Ismail Fajrie. “Aligning the Sunna and the JamÄ’a: Religious Authority and Islamic Social Formation in Contemporary Central Java, Indonesia.†University of Michigan, 2016.

An-Naim, Abdullahi Ahmed. “Islam and Secularism.†Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age, 1993, 217–28. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106703.

Anas, Muhammad. “Studi Komparatif MaqÄá¹£id Al-QurʾÄn AbÅ« ḤÄmid Muḥammad Ibn Muḥammad Al-GhazÄlÄ« dan RashÄ«d Riá¸Ä.†Universitas Islam Negeri Syariaf Hidayatullah, 2018.

Ansori. “QawÄ’id Fiqhiyyah as Islamic Epistemology and Its Application at Marriage Law in Indonesia.†Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 21, no. 1 (2022): 67–76. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i1.5529.

Aspers, Patrik, and Ugo Corte. “What Is Qualitative in Qualitative Research.†Qualitative Sociology 42, no. 2 (2019): 139–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7.

Asy-Syafi’i, Muhammad bin Allan As-Shodiqi. DalÄ«l Al-FÄlihÄ«n. Kairo: Syirkah Maktabah wa Mathba’ah Musthofa al-Bab al-Halabi wa Auladih, n.d.

Bakri Abd Hamid, Nur. “Elemen Fiqh Al-’AwlawiyyÄh dalam Al-Qur’an Menerusi Tafsiran Sayid Qutb Pada Empat Ayat Terpilih Elements of Fiqh Al-’AwlawiyyÄh in the Qur’an Through the Interpretation of Sayid Qutb in Four Selected Verses.†Jurnal Pengajian Islam 15, no. I (2022): 54–68.

Binjalun, Abdurrahman. Al-Ri’Äyah Al-IjtimÄ’iyyah Wa Al-TanmÄ«yah Min Manẓūr MaqÄá¹£idÄ«. Kairo: Dar al-Kalima, 2022.

Budiyanti, Nurti, Ahmad Syamsu Rizal, and Elan Sumarna. “Implikasi Konsep ŪlÅ«l ‘Ilmi dalam Al-Qur`Än Terhadap Teori Pendidikan Islam (Studi Analisis Terhadap Sepuluh TafsÄ«r Mu’Tabarah).†TARBAWY 3, no. 1 (2016): 51–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/t.v3i1.3459.

El-Mesawi, Mohamed El Tahir. “MaqÄá¹£id Al-Sharī’ah: Meaning, Scope and Ramifications.†Al-Shajarah 25, no. 2 (2020): 263–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v25i2.1141.

Fahrudin, Ahmad. “Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Al-Qur’an dan Al-Hadits (Upaya Menentukan Kebijakan Pendidikan Secara Religius).†Dirasah 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29062/dirasah.v4i2.304.

Hayati, Siti Muna, Husnul Khitam, Zainul Erfan, and Afifah Amini. “Religious Tradition and Technology: Debate among Penghulus about Online Marriage Law in Banjarmasin.†Journal of Islamic Law 5, no. 1 (2024): 105–24. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v5i1.2187.

ḤilalÄ«, Abd Al-RaḥmÄn. “MuqÄrabÄt MaqÄá¹£id Al-QurÄn Al-KarÄ«m Dirasah TÄrÄ«khiyyah.†Al-TajdÄ«d 2, no. 9 (2016): 193–234.

Huringiin, Nabila. “Ideas and Realization of Islamic University By Al-Attas (Case Study: Istac-Iiu Malaysia).†HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika 18, no. 1 (2021): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v18i1.623.17-31.

Inani, and Norhaniza. “Analisis Epistemologi Islam dalam Fiqh Keutamaan: Islamic Epistemological Analysis in Fiqh of Priority.†Sultan Alauddin Sulaiman Shah Journal 6, no. 1 (2019): 16–29. http://jsass.kuis.edu.my/index.php/jsass/article/view/72%0Ahttp://jsass.kuis.edu.my/index.php/jsass/article/download/72/56.

Islam, Tazul. “Expansion of MaqÄá¹£id Thought Beyond MaqÄá¹£id Al-SharÄ«Ê¿ah: MaqÄá¹£id Al-QurʾÄn As a New Paradigm.†Hamdard Islamicus 45, no. 4 (2022): 79–95. https://doi.org/10.57144/hi.v45i4.514.

———. “MaqÄá¹£id Ä€l-Qur’an: A Search For a Scholarly Definition.†Al-Bayan: Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 9, no. 1 (2011): 189–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-90000026.

———. “MaqÄá¹£id Al-QurʾÄn and MaqÄá¹£id Al-Sharī’ah: An Analytical Presentation.†Revelation and Science 03, no. 01 (1434): 50–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31436/revival.v3i01.85.

———. “The Genesis and Development of the MaqÄá¹£id Al-Qur’Än.†American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 30, no. 3 (2013): 39–58. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajiss.v30i3.301.

Ismail, Abdul Manan, Mushaddad Hasbullah, Irwan Mohd Subri, Lukman Abdul Mutalib, Mohd Soberi Awang, and Shahirah Hafiz Mohd Tahir Naeem. “Fiqh AwlawÄ«yyÄt dalam Fatwa Berkaitan Covid-19: Analisis Fatwa Terpilih.†Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies 23, no. 1 (2021): 1–21. https://al-qanatir.com/aq/article/view/303.

Jalil, Abdul, and Muhammad Taufiq. “Al-ĀṯÄr Al-Mutarattibah Ê¿alÄ PERPPU (LawÄʾiḥ Al-ḤukÅ«miyyah Al-Badaliyyah) Min Al-MunazzamÄt Al-MujtamÄÊ¿iyyah Raqm 2 Li Ê¿Ä€m 2017 Lidda WujÅ«d Ḥizb Al-TahrÄ«r IndÅ«nÄ«siyÄ Min Manẓūr Sadd Al-DharÄ’i’.†Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 14, no. 1 (2019): 146–77. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19105/al-ihkam.v14i1.1982.

Jauhar, Ahmad Al-Mursi Husain. MaqÄá¹£id Al-Sharī’ah. Jakarta: Amzah, 2023.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. “Actualisation (Taf’il) of the Higher Purposes (MaqÄá¹£id) of Al-SharÄ«Ê¿ah.†ICR Journal 8, no. 3 (2017): 295–321. https://doi.org/10.52282/icr.v8i3.177.

Manzur, Ibnu. LisÄn Al-Ê¿Arab. Bairut: Dar al-Sha, 1994.

Mazuki, Sarah Aqilah, Mohd Fadzhil Mustafa, Siti Khadijah Ismail, and Hannan Fatini Md Reshad. “Aplikasi Qh Al-AwlawiyyÄt dalam Menangani Isu Covid-19: Analisis Terhadap Isu Yang Terpilih [Application of Qh Al-AwlawiyyÄt in Dealing with Covid-19 Issues: Analysis of Selected Issues].†Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari 23, no. 3 (2022): 32–39. https://doi.org/10.37231/jimk.2022.23.3.695.

Miskari, Miskari. “Politik Hukum Islam dan MaqÄá¹£id Al-Sharī’ah.†Al Imarah : Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik Islam 4, no. 1 (2019): 57. https://doi.org/10.29300/imr.v4i1.2168.

Muhammad, Al-Gazâlî Abu Hamid Muhammad bin. Al-Arbaʿīn Fī Uṣūl Al-Dīn. Bairut: Dar al-Minhaj, 2017.

———. JawÄhir Al-QurʾÄn. Jeddah: Dar al-Minhaj, 2019.

Mujib, Lalu Supriadi B., and Khairul Hamim. “Religious Freedom and Riddah Through the MaqÄá¹£idÄ« Interpretation of Ibn ‘ĀshÅ«r.†HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 77, no. 4 (2021): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V77I4.6928.

Muksana Pasaribu. “Maslahat dan Perkembangannya Sebagai Dasar Penetapan Hukum Islam.†Jurnal Justitia I, no. 4 (2014): 350–60. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v1i04.%25p.

Musawwamah, Siti, Muhammad Taufiq, Erie Haryanto, Umi Supraptiningsih, and Maimun. “Resistance to Child Marriage Prevention in Indonesia and Malaysia.†Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 23, no. 1 (2023): 259–80. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v23i1.32014.

Musyahid, Achmad. “Ḥikmat At-Tashrīʿ Fī Ḍarūriyyah Al-Ḥamzah.†Al-Risalah 15, no. 2 (2015): 222–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v15i2.845.

Nastain, Nastain, Zubair Rahman Saende, and Muhammad Iqbal. “Fikih Prioritas Antara Rukhsah dan ‘Azīmah Saat Pandemi.†Jurnal Pendidikan Kreatif 4, no. 2 (2023): 87–113. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpk.v4i2.39899.

Nuansa, R. “Revitalisasi Filsafat Sains dengan Islam dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Era 5.0 Civil Society.†Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam dan Sains 2 (2020): 233–44. http://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/kiiis/article/view/408.

Othman, Zuraidah. “Fiqh Al-AwlawÄ«yyÄt: Memahami Keutamaan dalam Tindakan [Fiqh Al-AwlawÄ«yyÄt: Understanding Priority in Action].†International Journal of Contemporary Education, Religious Studies and Humanities 1, no. 3 (2021): 24–44. https://jurnal.nun-g.com/index.php/jcerah/article/view/328.

Pertiwi, Tanza Dona, and Sri Herianingrum. “Menggali Konsep MaqÄá¹£id Al-Sharī’ah: Perspektif Pemikiran Tokoh Islam.†Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 10, no. 1 (2024): 807. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v10i1.12386.

Reinhart, A Kevin. “Islamic Law as Islamic Ethics.†Journal of Religious Ethics 11, no. 2 (1983).

Sari, Fitri Agustina, and Agusman Damanik. “Konsep Self Healing dengan Zikir dan Syukur dalam Al-Qur’an.†JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) 8, no. 4 (2023): 353–61. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29210/30033835000.

Subhan Amin. “Keadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat.†El-Afkar 8, no. 1 (2019): 1–10. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/jpkth.v8i1.1997.

Sudirman, Edi Gunawan, and Muh. Rusdi Rasyid. “Covid-19 dan Ibadah (Resistensi Perubahan Hukum Islam dalam Mempertahankan Rutinitas Ibadah.†JURNAL AQLAM – Journal of Islam and Plurality 6, no. 1 (2021): 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2018.06.001.

Suhaimi, Muhamad Rezi, and Maman Rahman Hakim. “MaqÄá¹£id Al-Sharī’ah: Teori dan Implementasi.†Sahaja: Journal Shariah And Humanities 2, no. 1 (2023): hlm. 162-166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61159/sahaja.v2i1.13.

Tamer, Georges. “4 Revelation, Sciences and Symbolism: Al-GhazÄlī’s JawÄhir Al-QurʾÄn.†In Islam and Rationality: The Impact of Al-GhazÄlÄ«. Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary. Vol. 1, 49–88. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004290952_005.

Taufiq, H. Muhammad. “Implementasi Moderasi Beragama dalam Kontroversi Tawassul: Studi Fikih Komparatif.†Proceedings of Annual Conference for Muslim Scholars 6, no. 1 (2022): 854–59. https://doi.org/10.36835/ancoms.v6i1.433.

Taufiq, Mohammad, and Mohammad Umar Hafiz Mohammad Idrees. “Dawr At-Tarbiyyah Al-IslÄmiyyah FÄ« Naá¹£r at-TsaqÄfah Al-QÄnÅ«niyyah FÄ« Al-Mujtama’ Al-Muslim.†El Harakah 24, no. 2 (2022): 355–73. https://doi.org/10.18860/eh.v24i2.17637.

Walliman, Nicholas. Research Methods: The Basics. London: Routledge, 2017.

Yamani, Moh. Tulus. “Memahami Al-Qur ’ an dengan Metode Tafsīr Mauḏūʿī.†Jurnal PAI 1, no. 2 (2015): 273–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18860/jpai.v1i2.3352.

Zayyadi, Ahmad, Ridwan, Arif Hidayat, Ubaidillah, and Mowafg Abrahem Masuwd. “Understanding of Legal Reform on Sociology of Islamic Law: Its Relevance to Islamic Family Law in Indonesia.†Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 17, no. 2 (2023): 249–62. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v17i2.7584.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

In order to be accepted and published by Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial, author(s) submitting the article manuscript should complete all the review stages. By submitting the manuscript, the author(s) agreed to the following terms:

  1. The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish articles in various forms (including reprints). Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.
  2. Authors are permitted to disseminate published articles by sharing the link/DOI of the article at Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.
  3. Users/public use of this website will be licensed to CC-BY-SA.